Biology glossary

Monohybrid cross

Taught in
  • ICSE Class 10, Unit 4 Genetics

A monohybrid cross is a cross between two parents that differ in one pair of contrasting traits, such as tall and dwarf pea plants.

Deepti Sardana
Founder Member & Academic Lead

Cross a pure tall plant (TT) with a pure dwarf plant (tt). Every plant in the first generation, F1, is Tt. All of them are tall. Now cross two F1 plants. Each passes on T or t, so the second generation, F2, can be:

  • TT, Tt, Tt and tt.
  • Phenotype ratio: 3 tall to 1 dwarf.
  • Genotype ratio: 1 TT to 2 Tt to 1 tt.

Two of Mendel's laws explain it. Law of dominance: of a pair of contrasting alleles, only one shows. Law of segregation: the two alleles of a pair separate when gametes form, so each gamete gets one.

A small example

Round seed (R) is dominant over wrinkled (r). Cross two Rr plants. You expect 3 round to 1 wrinkled.

Where marks go

The 2024 ICSE Biology paper showed this seed-shape cross as a diagram. It asked which allele is dominant and which recessive. CISCE's report on the 2024 ICSE Biology paper says answers copied the diagram and did not state the seed shapes in words. For what the 3 : 1 ratio shows, the report names "genotype" written where "phenotype" was meant.

In the ICSE 2027 specimen paper, stating the law of segregation earns 2 marks. The draft marking scheme's answer: pairs of alleles separate during gamete formation.

About the author

Deepti Sardana

Founder Member & Academic Lead

An IIT alumna (M.Sc., M.Phil.) with over 25 years in teaching, child psychology and learning assessment. As Academic Lead at EduBrahma, she leads the method TRUtesting uses to find where and why a child loses marks.

Deepti Sardana on LinkedIn

Keep reading

All terms →
How evaluation worksStep marking: does CBSE give marks for steps?7 min readExam strategyWhy students lose marks they actually knew6 min read

See where your child's marks go.

Get one paper marked the way a board examiner would, and read the mark-loss report for yourself.

Get a paper evaluated